FIRST DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS

        

THESE SUMMARIES ARE NEITHER APPROVED IN ADVANCE NOR ENDORSED BY THE COURT.  THEY ARE NOT HEADNOTES OR SYLLABI.  INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD OBTAIN COPIES OF THE ACTUAL DECISIONS FROM THE CLERK OF THE COURT OF APPEALS.

 

DATE: Wednesday, January 28, 2025

CAPTION: IN RE: T.C.

APPEAL NO.: C-250010

TRIAL NO.: F/23/730 X

KEY WORDS: PARENTAL VISITATION — R.C. 3109.05 — BEST INTEREST 

SUMMARY: The juvenile court’s judgment awarding father limited supervised visitation with his son was not an abuse of discretion where the juvenile court’s factual findings are supported by competent credible evidence in the record and father’s conduct directed towards mother supported the juvenile court’s conclusion that father would struggle to coparent with mother. 

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

JUDGES: OPINION by BOCK, P.J.; NESTOR and MOORE, JJ., CONCUR.

 

CAPTION: STATE V. DUNN

APPEAL NO.: C-250257

TRIAL NO.: 24/CRB/21777/A

KEY WORDS: RESTITUTION — MARSY’S LAW — R.C. 2929.28 — ECONOMIC LOSS — ABILITY TO PAY 

SUMMARY: The trial court erred in denying victims-appellants’ restitution request based on defendant’s inability to pay where the trial court lacked any evidence of defendant’s inability to pay and victims have a right to restitution under the Ohio Constitution and R.C. 2929.28.

JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND CAUSE REMANDED

JUDGES: OPINION by BOCK, P.J.; NESTOR and MOORE, JJ., CONCUR.